We are constantly told that everyone is entitled to an opinion.
This is true.
Everyone is also entitled to wear Crocs to a wedding, put pineapple on pizza (which I don't mind at all, if I wasn't loading it up with a nosebleed five factor of chilli) and spend their retirement savings on commemorative plates. Entitlement does not automatically make something wise, attractive or worthy of respect.
Somewhere along the way, we confused a person’s right to express an opinion with everyone else’s obligation to treat that opinion as valuable.
They are not the same thing.
You are perfectly entitled to believe that the Earth is flat, vaccines contain tracking devices, climate change was invented by people selling reusable shopping bags, or that a crystal placed beside your bed will repair your liver while you sleep.
You may say it loudly. You may make a video about it. You may add dramatic music, capital letters and several red arrows pointing towards absolutely nothing.
But I am equally entitled to think your opinion is ridiculous. That it was, in fact, made by a dick.
This apparently comes as a shock.
People now present their opinions as though they are newborn babies that must be admired and protected. The moment anyone questions them, they become offended.
“That’s my opinion!”
Yes. I know. That is precisely the problem.
An opinion isn’t a magical shield against facts. It doesn’t become intelligent simply because it belongs to you. If you announce that gravity is a government conspiracy and then walk off a roof, gravity won’t pause halfway down because it respects your personal truth.
We used to understand that opinions had to earn credibility. You formed them after reading, listening, learning and occasionally accepting the deeply unpleasant possibility that you might be wrong.
Now, forming an opinion seems to require nothing more than a Facebook account and the ability to type “DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH” beneath an article you haven’t read.
Research once involved books, evidence, experts and perhaps several years at university. Today, it means watching three videos while sitting on the toilet.
The internet has made everyone feel qualified to speak with authority on everything. A person can spend twenty minutes online and emerge ready to correct doctors, scientists, economists, historians and anyone else foolish enough to have dedicated their life to understanding the subject.
Apparently, expertise is elitist now.
Of course, experts can be wrong. Governments can lie. Scientists can disagree. Doctors can make mistakes. Questioning authority is healthy and necessary.
But questioning something is not the same as inventing an answer you like better.
And disagreement is not censorship.
If you post your opinion publicly and someone tells you it makes no sense, your freedom of speech has not been taken away. It has been successfully exercised. You spoke—and then somebody else did.
That is how the arrangement works.
Freedom of speech does not include freedom from embarrassment, correction, contradiction or somebody asking where on Earth you got that idea.
We should respect people. We should allow them dignity, safety and the right to speak. But we do not have to respect every thought that wanders out of their head wearing a little hat marked “opinion.”
Some opinions are thoughtful.
Some are informed.
Some are based on experience.
And some are complete bollocks.
Pretending they all deserve equal respect doesn’t make us tolerant. It makes us intellectually lazy. It allows nonsense to sit beside knowledge as though the two are merely different flavours of the same thing.
They aren’t.
You can have your opinion.
You can share it.
You can defend it.
But once you release it into the world, the rest of us are allowed to examine it, challenge it and, if necessary, laugh at it.
Because everyone is entitled to an opinion.
They just aren’t entitled to have it admired.