When I read about this in the paper, I thought everyone’s reacting to the wrong part of this story. Yes — a seven-year-old was taken and killed. That’s bloody horrific. It should be but that’s not what stays with you. It’s what happened after.
He stopped. Bought cleaning supplies. Wiped down the van.
Calm. Methodical. No panic.
Just… cleaning.
That’s the part that doesn’t fit.
We like to believe violence looks chaotic. Loud. Out of control. This wasn’t. This was controlled. You don’t clean something by accident. You don’t stop, think, and remove evidence unless you know exactly what you’ve done.
Personally, I believe in the death penalty for child killers. I started a petition here to get it brought back years ago, but after getting thousands of signatures, I knew that the powers that be agreed with me. Except they wanted it brought back for murderers of politicians.
So, I put it down and went on with my life. But I regress...
People want an easier explanation for a rapist/child killer. “He snapped.” Or “He panicked.”
That ends the moment he starts wiping surfaces. Because that’s not panic. That’s function. And that’s the uncomfortable truth. The gap between “normal” and “unthinkable” isn’t as wide as people want it to be.
Drive. Stop. Murder. Clean. Continue.
That’s what sticks.
Not just what happened. How easily it fit into something that looked… routine. We want monsters to look different. Obvious. Recognisable.
They’re not.
That’s why this case sits differently. Not louder. Just…
closer.